Articles submitted for publication are reviewed by two independent reviewers. The publication follows a positive review of the work by two Reviewers. In the event of a discrepancy between the Reviewers, the Editorial Board may appoint a third Reviewer. Authors of the work must respond to the reviews by making appropriate corrections and corrections within 2 weeks after receiving the review e-mail. The editors do not reveal the names of the Reviewers.
The final decision on publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief after consulting the Editor and / or members of the Scientific Council.
Basic principles of reviewing publications in magazines
At least two independent reviewers from outside the unit are appointed to evaluate each publication.
In the case of texts created in a foreign language, at least one of the reviewers is affiliated with a foreign institution other than the nationality of the author of the work.
The recommended solution is a model in which the authors and reviewers do not know their identities (the so-called double-blind review process).
In other solutions, the reviewer must sign a declaration of no conflict of interest; a conflict of interest is considered to occur between the reviewer and the author: direct personal relationships (kinship, legal relationships, conflict), relationships of professional subordination, direct scientific cooperation during the last two years preceding the preparation of the review.
The review must be in written form and end with a clear conclusion as to the admission of the article to publication or its rejection.
The rules for qualifying or rejecting publications and a possible review form are publicly available on the journal’s website or in any issue of the journal.
The names of the reviewers of individual publications / numbers are not disclosed; once a year, the journal publishes a list of cooperating reviewers.